On 7 April 2014 15:00, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > (Adding [email protected]) > > Me: >> CT should not be a special case exemption from the agility spec. > > Ben: >> I think it should, and here's why: normally you want agility so endpoints >> can change their crypto in an orderly way, so as to phase out weak >> algorithms. In CT the endpoint is the enemy: you don't want it to be able to >> choose algorithms that suit it. > > What is the endpoint? The log server? I don't understand the point.
Yes, the log server. > And as I said, why can't you get the same effect with proper use of ALL CAPS > words in the RFC? What effect? You mean define an algorithm that the log server MUST use? _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
