On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > That's what transaparancy for DNSSEC is about that is being discussed in > the trans working group now. It's stil in the preliminairy stages, and > likely will take a back seat to the more urgent certificate transparency > which needs an audit log much more than DNSSEC.
And which is a good chance to remind everyone that this topic is off-topic here. This should be discussed there [trans]. Nico -- _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
