On 8/19/14 12:42 PM, Stephen Kent wrote: > As for a public statement wrt ignoring WG consensus (in an implementation) > by a doc "editor" it strikes me as very unusual, if not unique, based on > my 28 years of IETF participation.
This has not been an issue yet, and to be honest I do not anticipate that it will become one. We will deal with should it come up, but I'd rather go forward with a minimum of antagonism and with a continued focus on moving the document along. Melinda _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
