On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:09:49PM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote: > One of the issues that came up during the meeting in Toronto is how > to handle the specification of a gossip protocol. Ben has a proposal > included in the current draft. But, the sense of the room during the > session was that this should probably be split off into a separate > document, a gossip protocol specifically for CT, intended to be > published as a working group product and as an experimental protocol. > > So, we're checking to see if there's mailing list agreement that > this is how we'd like to handle specification of a gossip protocol. > (At this time I'm less concerned about whether or not this would be > an experimental RFC than I am about whether or not there's agreement > to split this out).
I think it makes sense for the specification of the gossip protocol to be separate from the specification for the log protocol. - Matt _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
