Greg,
I'm impressed by your web site graphics.
Unfortunately, for RFCs, we have to stick with ASCII art, which is
painful and
only black and white. So, although I agree that diagrams are very helpful
when trying to understand the CT context, I won't be able to incorporate
them
into my text.
I have not visited the Google CT web site because I focus on what we do
in IETF
WGs, and for that only material published in that context counts. In
fact, I have
complained about referring to the CT web site to gain a better understanding
of what 6962-bis is supposed to mean; discussion and explanations of CT
need to
be part of the IETF archival data, not on an independent web site. But,
that's another
issue.
I'm continuing to revise the attack analysis, based on my analysis of the
CABF guidelines, more thought, and helpful feedback from folks like Rick
and Santosh.
I'll post an updated version of the attack analysis later this week,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
