Hello Linus! On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Linus Nordberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote > Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:21:43 -0700: > > | You all may have noticed that Linus has uploaded three > | drafts on gossip protocols for CT. Please give those > | a read. In the short term we need something we can > | publish as an experimental standard, so please give some > | thought about how to move this work forward. Once > | there's been some discussion we can adopt a draft as > | a working group deliverable. > > Right. I should've announced it here. > > Gossip split up in three pieces -- general, with a message format; CT > specific saying STH and also SCT but with limited destinations; an HTTPS > transport: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linus-trans-gossip/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linus-trans-gossip-transport-https/ > > There's a fourth element which isn't found in any of these and that's > strategy, or policy, for gossiping. That's been left out partly because > I don't have an answer but also because I don't think it should be > standardised. > I'm sorry, I did not understand the data flow in whole. Did I understand correctly that browsers will gossip when they communicate with (web)servers? If so, the servers should process the gossip data they got, working as auditors. Or do I miss something? Thank you! -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
