One of the open issues (ticket 34:
https://tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/34)
concerns SCT syntax, with Steve Kent arguing that either ASN.1 should
be used or that there needs to be a clearer justification for the
choice of 5246 representation (see RFC 5246, section 4).  We need to
come to a decision whether or not to go ahead and carry forward what's
in 6962 (the TLS format).  This is a call for discussion - we'd really
like to close this in the next week or so.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to