#26: Precertificates: Find alternative format to X.509 Changes (by [email protected]):
* owner: [email protected] => [email protected] Comment: Decision (finally!): Precertificates will be CMS signed-data objects instead of X.509 certs. This has been discussed on the TRANS mailing list and at the Hawaii TRANS meeting, and AFAIK nobody has objected to this approach. Proposed text: https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/9 -- ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/26#comment:1> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
