#54: Simplify name redaction
Comment (by [email protected]): I've just spotted the glaring error in this proposal. Without the "redactedLabels" extension in the Certificate, it would be rather hard to reconstruct the TBSCertificate and verify the SCT signature(s) because you'd have to guess which labels need to be changed to "?"s. Let's leave this ticket open for now, in the hope that we can find some other way to reduce the "risk of misalignment" that Eran mentioned. If we can't, then I suppose this ticket will need to be resolved as invalid. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: [email protected] | [email protected] Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/54#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
