I see what you mean. Thank you.
On 2/17/15 10:21 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 16 February 2015 at 23:39, Karen Seo <[email protected]> wrote:
Folks,
I've found the discussion on the list and the analysis itself helpful in
clarifying and assessing the aims and mechanisms 6962-bis. It strikes me
that it would be similarly helpful to other users/readers of 6962-bis. What
does the group think of adding it to 6962-bis?
As I indicated in my previous message, it needs some work before it
could be added. However, I do think it is a useful starting point.
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
