Ben,
In general, if you want us to remember to do something about your
comments, you need to open or update Trac tickets (discussion here
before doing so is fine, of course).
that was my plan. post comments first, then generate tickets.
*1. Informal Introduction*
Why is this still an “informal” introduction? Doesn’t a standards
track RFC deserve a real introduction :-)?
It is informal in that the treatment of the subject is informal. The
remainder of the RFC is the formal part.
This is not a distinction we tend to make in RFCs. I don't recall seeing
another
RFC that has an introduction labelled as informal. See
https://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html
The last paragraph in this section asserts that it is efficient
for (unspecified parties, formerly known as Auditors) to detect
log misbehavior, but does not provide evidence that such detection
is, in fact, efficient.
However, the remainder of the document does. If we turn the
introduction into a formal treatment, it becomes the whole document.
And then we need to write a new introduction.
no, just add a pointer to the place in the doc where you believe the
assertion is substantiated.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
