#14: Clarify ASN.1 encoding Changes (by [email protected]):
* status: assigned => closed * resolution: => needs-review Comment: Whilst tackling this ticket, I took the opportunity to revamp the whole of section 3.4. It's quite a big diff, but much of it is just moving sentences around. Since this is the only change between -06 and -07, you can view it here: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-06&url2 =draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-07 P.S. Does anyone know why xml2rfc has not added sections 3.4.2.1 and 3.4.2.2 to the table of contents? -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: needs-review Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/14#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
