Looks like I dropped the ball on this.

#84 created.


Eran Messeri <[email protected]> wrote
Thu, 14 May 2015 10:25:10 +0100:

| Looks good, except I'd move the sentence about a root certificate having an
| empty certificate_chain to the end (since it's not the common case).
| 
| Linus, mind filing a ticket in trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ so we can
| track this change?
| 
| On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Linus Nordberg <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| > Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote
| > Tue, 12 May 2015 08:27:11 -0400 (EDT):
| >
| > | As an implementer, can you offer improved text? We are in the process of
| > | writing a bis document after all - now is a good time.
| >
| > Current 6962bis:
| > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
| >    "leaf_certificate" is the end-entity certificate submitted for
| >    auditing.
| >
| >    "certificate_chain" is a chain of additional certificates required to
| >    verify the end-entity certificate.  The first certificate MUST
| >    certify the end-entity certificate.  Each following certificate MUST
| >    directly certify the one preceding it.  The final certificate MUST
| >    either be, or be issued by, a root certificate accepted by the log.
| > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
| >
| > Proposed 6962bis:
| > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
| >    "leaf_certificate" is the end-entity certificate submitted for
| >    auditing.
| >
| >    "certificate_chain" is a chain of additional certificates required to
| >    verify the end-entity certificate.  A root certificate has an empty
| >    certificate_chain.  If present, the first certificate MUST
| >    certify the end-entity certificate.  Each following certificate MUST
| >    directly certify the one preceding it.  The final certificate MUST
| >    either be, or be issued by, a root certificate accepted by the log.
| > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
| >
| > _______________________________________________
| > Trans mailing list
| > [email protected]
| > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>
| _______________________________________________
| Trans mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to