On 6/8/15 11:20 AM, Rob Stradling wrote: > Future implementers will read the 6962-bis RFC. How do we ensure that > these implementers are made aware that the 6962-bis Security > Considerations don't give the full picture (of how to build a secure CT > ecosystem)? > > I suggest that the 6962-bis Security Considerations should reference the > threat analysis I-D.
It would need to in any event, I believe. Melinda _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
