#73: Section 3 text re log cert validation is ambiguous
Comment (by [email protected]): On the issue of specifying deviations, I am not sure how that could realistically be done. For example, our logs will permit whatever deviations OpenSSL permits. I don't think anyone knows precisely what those are, and I'm prepared to bet they vary between versions. Even leaving that aside, experience suggests we have to permit deviations in order to admit incorrect certificates that are accepted by browsers. I don't think we can anticipate what all of those are. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/73#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
