DKG emphasizing privacy? Imagine that :) > Irrespective of whether auditing is a function or a stand alone entity, there > is > a need for a complete description of how it works. The authors seem to have > a different view from a proposal presented by DKG at the last meeting, in > terms of the communication paths involved in auditing. That proposal > emphasized privacy for TLS clients, and thus it merits further discussion. So, > at this time, it seems premature to declare the design of auditing done. I > suggest 6269-bis limit its discussion of auditing to noting which log > interfaces > are used to support the function, and assume that a separate doc will specify > how auditing is performed.
I agree with this! _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
