#96: Metadata: Should it be dynamic? Changes (by [email protected]):
* milestone: => review Comment: We've already discussed this, I feel sure, and the general point is that allowing logs to manipulate their own metadata is dangerous, as you state. That's why the I-D says its distribution is out of scope. As you know, in practice, Chrome defines its own log metadata, and that is what clients use. I imagine this will be the general pattern. I propose this is resolved as wontfix. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/96#comment:1> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
