#94: Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this?
Comment (by [email protected]): I'd just like to note that ticket #10 aims to (re)introduce the option of passing inclusion proofs (embedded in certs, OCSP responses or a TLS extension) instead of SCTs. This ticket's question is still relevant when SCTs are used, of course. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/94#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
