Rob,
I thought the intent, going forward was to make 6962-bis a description
of log operation. if so, then this new feature does not belong in that doc.
It belongs in a spec for Subjects (aka web site operators), or in the
arch doc.
Steve
On 08/09/15 21:54, Adam Eijdenberg wrote:
<snip>
We'd also be quite open to exploring other ideas, though the above is
what we're currently planning/started building out (and won't require
additional work by log operators).
Note [1] that for 6962-bis we're planning to make it possible for
servers/certs to optionally embed/send inclusion proofs instead of SCTs.
When this option is used, the question of how to fetch inclusion proofs
in a privacy preserving manner doesn't even need to be asked. :-)
[1] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/104
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
