I'd like to bring three new -00 I-Ds to the attention the the WG. They are
requirements specs: Monitor and Auditor, (CT-aware) CA and Subject, and
browser and browser vendor. Each is brief, 10-11 pages, and easy to read.

   http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dseomn-trans-browsers/

   http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-trans-monitor-auditor/

   http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kseo-trans-ca-subject/


The CT architecture doc (version -01) also has been extensively revised,
and made shorter, and is a companion to the requirement specs noted above.

   http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-trans-architecture/

I think these docs provide a clear description of the CT system and
(a first cut) at requirements for the elements of that system (other than
the log). I suggest the WG consider adopting these docs and revising 6962-bis to become a description of the log and a requirements spec for it. That would
allow 6962-bis to be more focused, shorter, and hopefully, easier to read.

Happy turkey day (to those in the U.S.),

Steve
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to