#94: Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this?
Comment (by [email protected]): From the mailing list (Quoting Steve Kent): "I think the text in draft-dseomn-trans-browsers-00.txt addresses the topic of what a browser can/should do re SCTs more clearly that 6962-bis, although the browser I-D not been updated to reflect the possibility of an inclusion proof being sent as part of an SCT. Also, the topic of when a server should send an inclusion proof, or when a CA should embed a proof in an SCT in a cert, should be addressed in I-Ds that thoroughly describe server and CA behaviors, e.g., draft-kseo-trans-ca-subject-00.txt." -- ------------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/94#comment:6> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
