#124: introduction needs work Changes (by [email protected]):
* owner: [email protected] => [email protected] Comment: Steve, can you please point out particular text in the introduction that is less clear than text used in the architecture document? Will be happy to re-use some text from that document, but for me the introduction is pretty straightforward (which isn't surprising given my familiarity with the topic. A fresh opinion would help here). -- --------------------------+--------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | --------------------------+--------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/124#comment:1> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
