#153: Finish documenting support for RFC6962 (v1) structures in TransInfo
Comment (by [email protected]): Out for review in https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency- rfcs/pull/135 In short: - Removed all v1 structs because I didn't see a compelling reason to keep them. - Explained V1/V2 interoperability. - Specified a way for V1 and V2 SCTs to co-exist in a certificate. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/153#comment:1> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
