#118: Monitor function description problem Changes (by [email protected]):
* owner: [email protected] => [email protected] Comment: Is the problem here that the term 'monitoring' means something different in this context, making the introduction and Section 9.3. inconsistent? I can suggest a few resolutions: (1) Replacing the word 'monitor' in the introduction with 'watch'. (2) Modify the Monitor section to indicate a monitor can either ensure logs behave correctly, watch for certificates of interest or do both. From what Steve says, it seems the term 'monitor' in CT context is used to refer both to monitors that audit logs and ones that just watch for certificates of interest, so option (2) seems more reasonable to me. -- --------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | --------------------------+------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/118#comment:3> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
