#157: Conflate Version and TransType
Comment (by [email protected]): Sounds good to me - not only will it remove a field, it will also make it crystal clear in implementations which SCTs and other data structures the code is referring to (assuming they stick to the RFC naming convention!). The only suggestion I have, and it's a very minor one, is to name it VersionedTransType. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/157#comment:1> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
