On 3/30/16 9:04 AM, David A. Cooper wrote:
If Steve would just describe DKG's attack instead of trying to use this as a forum for advancing his personal beliefs about X.509, then we wouldn't have to deal with these metaphysical arguments.
I understand that you and some other participants are frustrated at the moment but it would be helpful if the discussion could remain technical in nature. We have working group agreement that the attack described by DKG needs to be documented and included in the threat draft. The draft is not going to back into working group last call without it, period. There may be other missing attacks as well and I think that given where we are today it might be productive for those to be discussed in a different thread, to avoid confusion about what's actually under discussion. In the meantime, if we can't get some text about the dual CA attack in the next few weeks we may reach out to other participants to draft something up for inclusion. Melinda _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
