Ben,
Jon Postel's adage is generally a good idea for interoperability, in
general.
I thought the suggestion here was to suggest that logs may impose other
criteria
on submissions, e.g., chain length to a set of known (hopefully
advertised) trust anchors,
and that these criteria would not be easily known by submitters.
perhaps I misunderstood the suggestion.
Steve
...
The point here is to allow logs to be more liberal in what they
accept, which is surely a benefit? Logs should still be required to
accept well-formed chains to known roots, that I definitely agree with.
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
