On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:31:07 +0100
Rob Stradling <[email protected]> wrote:

> Steve,
> 
> I consider the consensus of this WG to be "the definitive
> expert".  :-)
> 
> FWIW though, I concur with Andrew's attack description and impact 
> characterization.  Regarding fixing it: I'd rather nuke the redaction 
> option than add further complexity.

I think the removal of redaction should be considered.  For those who
haven't been following Chrome's ct-policy list, Chrome has announced
that they will not be supporting redaction, at least until a list of
concerns is addressed:

https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/ct-policy/fCt4Bm03GsI/jBbqE_QWBQAJ

Addressing those concerns may require additional standardization (e.g.
a CAA property for domain owners to opt-in to redaction). If there's
still interest in redaction, it could be done in a future document,
along with the necessary work to make it acceptable to Chrome. In the
meantime, someone might find a simpler way to address this attack.

Regards,
Andrew

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to