Peter,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote:
As we approach the end of working group last call on 6962-bis,
it looks like we have an unresolved question about whether
name redaction should stay or go. I just went through the
mailing list archive and it looks like we have squishy
agreement that it should go (for example, Rob's comment:
"Regarding fixing it: I'd rather nuke the redaction
option than add further complexity."). So, if anybody has
particularly strong feelings about this, or disagrees
about removing name redaction, please weigh in.
To be clear, are you asking about 4.2 and 4.3 or just 4.2?
As I noted in my message to Ben yesterday, section 10.2. is also
relevant, as it mandates TLS client behavior that deals with
name-redacted certs.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
