[email protected] wrote Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:04:17 -0700: > Title : Gossiping in CT > Authors : Linus Nordberg > Daniel Kahn Gillmor > Tom Ritter > Filename : draft-ietf-trans-gossip-03.txt > Pages : 56 > Date : 2016-07-08 > > Abstract: > The logs in Certificate Transparency are untrusted in the sense that > the users of the system don't have to trust that they behave > correctly since the behavior of a log can be verified to be correct. > > This document tries to solve the problem with logs presenting a > "split view" of their operations. It describes three gossiping > mechanisms for Certificate Transparency: SCT Feedback, STH > Pollination and Trusted Auditor Relationship. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-gossip/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-gossip-03 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-trans-gossip-03
Hi group, The authors of trans-gossip think that this draft is now in a state where the group should read it and comment on it. While it needs wordsmithing, we hope algorithmically we're done. Our goal is to get it to last call in time for the Seoul meeting later this year. Those of you who care about CT gossip and are in Berlin for the IETF should join us in an informal meeting sometime during the week for discussions about what needs to be done. Please indicate availability in the following dudle: https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/ietf96-ct-gossip/ If you're note in Berlin but still would like to join, let us know and we'll try to figure something out. Thanks, Linus _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
