I also objected to removing name redaction, but I think it was just Rich and
I.

-----Original Message-----
From: Trans [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 6:36 PM
To: Melinda Shore <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Trans] Name redaction consensus call

> Since there was no comment at all on the proposal to retain name 
> redaction, we appear to have complete agreement that it should go.  
> We'll go back into wglc when a new version is submitted.

I did reply that I wanted to keep redaction, but agree that consensus is
against it.

--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to