I would be happy to be involved, and the Censys Project would be interested in implementing an agreed API as part of its CT monitoring.
Zakir > On Oct 25, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Andrew Ayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:21:59 +0100 > Rob Stradling <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now we've completed WGLC for 6962-bis, I'd like to pick this thread >> back up again. >> >> Several different public CT monitoring services now exist (crt.sh, >> Cert Spotter, Censys.io, etc). ISTM that it would be useful to >> define a common API that could be implemented by each monitor, so >> that end-users don't have to implement multiple APIs in order to talk >> to multiple monitors. >> >> Matt Palmer and I made a start on a (very drafty) draft a while ago: >> https://github.com/tobermorytech/ct-monitor-api-rfc/blob/master/draft-palmer-ct-monitor-api.md >> >> Who's interested in working on this? > > Count me in. > > Regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans > _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
