The survey is ongoing and informal, targeting our enterprise clients (over
SMB). I wanted to get some data in place (even if informal) so there was
some information about the need redaction. Although the survey is anonymous,
we allowed participants to opt-out of the privacy, which means I should have
real names to provide at the end of the survey. 

The list of questions:
1) Are you concerned about the Google requirement to log each certificate
issued in a public database?
2) If yes, why are you concerned? 
3) Would having a way to redact information from certificates alleviate your
concern? 
4) If yes, which proposal would you like DigiCert to support (select all):
Hide the DNS label, Hid the subject information, issue under a technically
constrained intermediate. 
5) Any additional comments?
6) Do you plan on using CAA? 

Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: Trans [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Medin
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 4:03 PM
To: Matt Palmer <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Trans] Redaction

Yea, I'm stunned that 50% of respondents can operate in the strait jacket of
TCSC, although I can see that working for Plex's customer IP address privacy
concern.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trans [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Palmer
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 5:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Trans] Redaction
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:30:20PM +0000, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> > We've been conducting short surveys of key customers to find out 
> > whether redaction is of interest to server operators, what form of 
> > redaction they'd like most, and why they are concerned about 
> > redaction. Here are the results so far:
> 
> Can you share the sample size, respondent size, survey methodology, 
> and (anonymised, if necessary) raw result data?  Summaries of response 
> data
are
> far less enlightening than the actual responses data points.
> 
> - Matt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to