On 21 December 2016 at 13:28, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Since the last (second) WGLC of the 6962bis document, a number of > changes were made that although relatively contained, caused a > non-trivial amount of change in the document. It mostly relates > to the IANA registries and a further removal of text related to > redaction that is moving into a separate document. We still thought > it best to restart a WGLC for this. > ... > Please send feedback to the list, even (especially) if you sent feedback > on the previous WGLC.
-bis defines "Monitors watch logs to check that they behave correctly, for certificates of interest, or both." In my mind, I I thought in many others minds, this definition is split: A 'Monitor' which provides user notification of certificates of interest. An 'Auditor' does log consistency checking. Monitors are therefore public-facing (for some definition of public, it might be paid subscribers for example), while auditors are not necessarily so. In the Gossip draft, one can run an auditor that exposes a public interface for submissions, or one can run a fully private auditor that polls servers to collect data. If others agree with me, I can provide text suggestions splitting the two definitions again. -tom _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
