On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm confused by this conclusion, and apologies if I've misunderstood. > > Can you explain how this statement differs, from say a discussion about > keeping a database in RAM and never flushing to disk? You can have amazing > QPS - but terrible reliability. It sounds like you're describing that > you've built an unreliable, but efficient, system, and are using that as > proof that reliability is not a critical property? >
And as a concrete example, consider https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/ct-policy/ohtZ64gLN3I/q4nSPkrWCQAJ
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
