On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:48:32PM -0700, Andrew Ayer wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:44:46 +0100 > Linus Nordberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The gossip protocol should work for both CT v1 and CT v2. If it > > doesn't, we should fix that. If that's not possible, let's define a > > gossip protocol version two. > > The sth-pollination protocol defined in draft-ietf-trans-gossip-04 > could work with v1 STHs, but section 8.2.4 says it contains an > array of v2 STHs: > > "sths - an array of 0 or more fresh SignedTreeHeads as defined in > [RFC-6962-BIS-09] Section 3.6.1." > > For this reason, I've been implementing draft-ietf-trans-gossip-00, > which uses v1 STHs and uses the URL .well-known/ct/v1/sth-pollination.
That one also has an sth_version as one of the fields, so I assume it works for both versions. But if I look at other things, it's not obvious to me if it works or not. Kurt _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
