On 06/04/17 13:27, Eran Messeri wrote:
I intend to adopt Richard's suggestion of merging the extension types
for SCTs and STHs.
Currently there doesn't seem to be a good reason to separate the two -
since the extensions are typed, it'd be easy to differentiate between
the two, and there may be extensions which are shared between SCTs and STHs.
This has been reviewed
in https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/224,
rationale updated in https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/173.
I support this too.
Note: I just did some editorial follow-up work in
https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/244
--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
