On Wed, 3 May 2017 18:53:00 +0100
Eran Messeri <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm looking for opinions on ticket 179
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/179>, which suggests
> "folding" the Cert/Precert indicator for an SCT into the data
> structure contained in the TransItem (right now it's part of the
> TransItem type indicator).
> 
> Personally I find it hard to justify such a change, since SCTs are
> already clearly defined as TransItems and it's a non-trivial change
> to the data structures without a strong benefit.
> 
> Suggestions?

I agree that there isn't a very strong justification for making a
non-trivial change like this.

I would also like to understand why 6962-bis consolidated all the type
indicators into a single one before that work is undone.

Absent a stronger justification and an explanation of why the
consolidation was done in the first place, I favor keeping 6962-bis
as-is.

Regards,
Andrew

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to