On Thu, 04 May 2017 19:20:47 +0000 Nick Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm also in favor of this change. I would further suggest that this > list be required to be consistent, monotonically increasing and that > the results of this API be something that monitors exchange > information about. Hi Nick, Could you explain what you mean by "consistent"? As for monotonically increasing, does the following language in Rob's PR match what you mean? "These STHs SHALL be ordered chronologically by timestamp, oldest first, beginning with the earliest STH in the specified range." The gossip draft defines an STH pollination mechanism that monitors can use to exchange STHs that they observe. Would this work, or were you thinking about something else? Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
