On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Paul Hadfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Without this API, CT Monitors that ingest a log's entries from STHm to STHn > (n>m) could incorrectly identify an MMD violation, as it is possible for > them to have missed an STH that sits between m and n.
Wouldn't this require the monitor to know what time the claimed in-between STH was generated? Cheers, Brian -- https://briansmith.org/ _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
