#170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
-------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: rlb@… | Owner: eranm@…
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: review
Component: rfc6962-bis | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by linus@…):
From
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/slDhAuH3WW1AvX9wManfViWe4fg:
"I withdraw my support for separate keys for signing SCT's and STH's and
will update #170 to reflect this."
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/170#comment:4>
Public Notary Transparency Wiki <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans>
My example project
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
