Eran Messeri <[email protected]> wrote: > * Remove references to 6979. > * Remove the strong requirement to use deterministic signature schemes (MUST > -> SHOULD), so implementations can use non-deterministic signature schemes > and still be compliant with the spec. > * Add reference to EdDSA, which includes a deterministic signature scheme > variant. > * Mention that deterministic signatures can be achieved by storing the > produced signatures.
This sounds good to me. I'm not sure that the reference to RFC 6979 needs to be removed. It could be referenced as an example of a deterministic signature scheme. Cheers, Brian _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
