On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Linus Nordberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rob Stradling <[email protected]> wrote > Fri, 19 May 2017 17:19:03 +0100: > > > On 12/05/17 14:55, Linus Nordberg wrote: > >> I like the single add-entry call idea together with the explicit > >> 'is_precertificate' indication. > > > > Would "submit-entry" be a better API name than "add-entry" (given that > > the Submitter can't guarantee that the log will accept the submission > > and add it to its tree)? > > No objection. > > > > (Attempt at future-proofing) > > Rather than an "is_precertificate" parameter, how about adding a > > "type" parameter that takes a VersionedTransType integer value? > > i.e., x509_entry_v2(1) or precert_entry_v2(2), for the two types of > > submission that 6962-bis cares about. > > Support. > This all sounds fine to me. > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
