On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 7:03 PM, Eran Messeri <[email protected]> wrote:
The reason is it doesn't make sense to ask for new entries unless you
know they're there - by first calling get-sth to learn of a new tree
head.
In this case I can poll for get-sth, no? From section 8.2:
> Fetch the current STH (Section 5.2). Repeat until the STH changes.
How this "repeat" will look in practice? Like while(0) {... sleep(1)}?
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
