Hi again. Please disregard this request. After further discussion on the TRANS WG mailing list, we've decided to take a different approach.
On 20/06/2019 18:18, Rob Stradling wrote: > Well-known URI Reviewers, > > This request, sent on behalf of the TRANS Working Group, relates to the > Certificate Transparency (CT) v2 specification (6962-bis). CT v1 > (RFC6962) defined CT Log endpoint URLs in a manner since prohibited by > BCP 190. A blocking comment during IESG Last Call for 6962-bis requires > us to make changes so that CT v2 (when published) is compliant with BCP > 190, so therefore we would like to register the following .well-known URI: > > URI suffix: > ct > > Change controller: > IETF > > Specification document(s): > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ > (see section 4.1) > > Related information: > None > -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Email: [email protected] Bradford, UK Office: +441274024707 Sectigo Limited This message and any files associated with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
