SGTM. How does this look? https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/311
On 03/07/2019 17:29, Andrew Ayer wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:04:04 +0100 > Eran Messeri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think under-specifying it right now is the only option as we have no >> specification of the log metadata. I don't think it's too big of a >> deal as when people start implementing 6962-bis I expect the log >> metadata format will evolve based on the existing schemas and, if >> necessary, could be standardized. > > Agreed. > > Regards, > Andrew -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Sectigo Limited _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
