FYI. If you weighed in during the BCP 190 discussion you may want to give this a read during wg last call.
Melinda -------- Forwarded Message -------- To: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <[email protected]> From: Adam Roach <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:52 -0500 Subject: [art] Last Call for Comments: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis (BCP 190 update) ART community (cc DISPATCH and HTTPBIS, but please respond only to ART): Based on conversations on the DISPATCH and ART mailing lists this past summer [1], and on in-person discussions that took place in Montreal, Mark Nottingham has produced a revision of BCP 190 that takes into account community input on several points. The changes are all intended to be relaxations of previously-enforced restrictions on how URI namespaces could be used. The revised document is at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis/ And diffs from the current, in-force version of BCP 190 can be seen here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc7320&url2=draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02 This message is intended to serve as a final, two-week last call for input from the ART community before the document is put forth for formal IETF consensus. The final consensus document will be published as a replacement of RFC 7320 (formally, it will obsolete it), and will become the new BCP 190. Please provide input on the document on the ART mailing list ([email protected]) by Wednesday, October 30th. To prevent the conversation from becoming fragmented, please do not respond to the HTTPBIS or DISPATCH mailing lists on this topic. Thanks! /a ____ [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=bcp%20190&f_list=art%2Cdispatch _______________________________________________ art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
