The latest draft contains wording to address all but one of the DISCUSS items. I had thought I needed Ben Kaduk’s feedback, but that was only because I was working from a summary of his statement. Seeing the actual text, I now understand what he was saying.
I also went through the IESG ballot at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ballot/ to review all the COMMENTs. https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/323 is my attempt to address all of Roman’s comments. https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/324 is my attempt to address all of Mirja’s comments except for four (noted in the PR) where I think the WG disagreed. https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/325 is my attempt to address all of Alexey’s comments. It is waiting for the WG to confirm my supposition about the base64 encoding. In the next day or two I hope to have a PR with my attempt to address Ben’s comments.
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
