On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:34:19 +0000 "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In his comments, Ben points out the following for 5.4 and 5.5: > > IMPORTANT: The input to get-proof-by-hash has a "tree_size" but the > processing discussion refers to a single "requested STH". It does not > seem like the one uniquely determines the other, since there could be > multiple valid STHs for a given tree size (e.g., if there are no > submissions for more than the MMD). Is the intent to supply an STH as > input, or is there otherwise need for further clarity here? The intent is to specify a tree head for which an STH exists. I've opened a PR that makes the language clearer: https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/329 Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
