Indeed. Rich was quick on the trigger. I shared the module that I had developed for RFC 6962, and then a day later I proposed one for this Internet-Draft.
Russ > On Apr 27, 2021, at 11:57 AM, Andrew Ayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:18:04 +0000 > "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Below is the approach that I took for RFC 6962. I had to make up >>> names because there are no hints in the document in some cases. >>> Suggestions for the bis document are welcome. >> >> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/330 > > Alas, this ASN.1 module is inapplicable to CTv2, as CTv2 uses all new > extensions and OIDs. > > I believe the only two OIDs are: > > 1.3.101.75 - for the Transparency Information X.509v3 extension (Section 7.1) > > 1.3.101.78 - for the Precertificate CMS content type (Section 3.2) > > Regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
